My hunch about the universe...so far: I suspect that upon
further examination that it will become clear that there couldn't possibly be a
beginning of time since “beginnings” occur within time. This seeming to be true,
I further surmise that since time and space seem to be inseparably intermingled
that these two are concurrent and form the dynamic environment that gave rise
to physical reality and possibly other kinds as well. The idea that time and
space could themselves be caused seems to be a nonsensical one to me for
causation itself requires time, a subject and an agent at minimum. I am then left
with the sense that the “change” (if it can indeed be called that) from
nothingness to somethingness need not and perhaps, cannot be reckoned as one
that was “caused” by anything. In other words, There was nothing and then there
was and that’s all there is to it; these sorts of things happen all the time
and it’s kind of arrogant to think that our reality requires some sort of special
examination. Realities just pop into and out of existence. It’s the way things
are. It’s what existence does. Get over it.
That all may sound a little odd to some. Well, hold onto
your hats because I think that the truth behind the curtain is that there is a
level of actuality beyond space and time; existence itself. Existence is the truly
eternal ground. It cannot be caused. Even the thought of the causation of
existence instinctively seems nonsensical to me. Now before I get accused of perpetrating
a verbal trick or falling into an unwitting Use Mention Error (I recently came
to understand this concept with clarity thanks to a speech by Dan Dennett) with
regards to the concept of existence, let me say that I am not mistaking the
concept of existence for a real thing. No, I am quite deliberately saying that I’d
bet that it will one day be borne out that existence is in fact an actual thing and that space and time and the subsequent physical
realities that seemingly burst into existence are nothing but fleeting temporal
perturbations of the fabric of its potentiality.
Well, that’s my hunch. It could just be mumbo jumbo but I
think there’s interesting brain food there and hope you enjoy. Again, it’s just a hunch. I think that it can’t
be thought of as anything but science fiction at this time because we just don’t
yet have the scientific tools to go beyond the onset of the physical universe but
we are getting closer every day with advances in cosmology and theoretical
physics. I’ll also bet that some future theoretical
physicists may drop the “physical” part of their moniker because they’ll be
spending a lot of time talking about things that were antecedent to the physical
reality proper.
I’d be interested in hearing your hunches or to learn about
advances in thinking along these lines.
~SOS~
You will enjoy a book I am reading, Why Does the World Exists, by Jim Hoyt. Your ideas are, I would say, quite advanced. I was born in the year your father was. Very sad he died so young.
ReplyDeleteEven younger than you thought Earl; I made a typo/mistake (hard to tell which it was now); he died in 89 at the age of 49. I'll have outlived him if I'm graced with just 6 more years of life. Thanks for the tip on the book. I'll have to check it out.
DeleteNot sure if you like it. But I am also intrigued by a series on History Channel "Ancient Aliens" Check it out
ReplyDelete